Social Protection and the Impact of the Pandemic in a Conflict Country
Clicks: 1
ID: 314457
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #970 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract While the pandemic has taken a toll on lives and livelihoods across the world, the impact on low-income countries in conflict can be significantly worse: Due to conflict, a large share of the already meager public expenditures is allocated to security, while public services are contained only within the areas that the government controls. Focusing on Afghanistan as a case study, this chapter discusses how the pandemic has further exacerbated the economic, health, and social conditions. It initially describes and evaluate the characteristics, coverage, and outcomes of the social protection system. It then traces the evolution and current state of the economy and poverty, reviews the state of health services, and estimates the effects of the pandemic based on a model specifically developed for Afghanistan regarding the impact on (a) GDP arising from domestic and regional factors (e.g., reduction in trade with trading partner countries as well as the repatriation of Afghan workers from those countries, and (b) the resulting impact on public revenues and the government’s (in)ability to provide an adequate health and social protection response amid continuing conflict, weak governance, and limited national outreach. The chapter concludes with proposals for social protection to (a) mitigate the humanitarian crisis from immediate impact of the pandemic on the general population, as well as the internally displaced and refugees, and (b) create a basis for building an adequate and feasible social protection system in the longer run.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7161977088
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Şebnem Şahin, Zafiris Tzannatos |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197761465.013.0014
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.