Social Protection and the Impact of the Pandemic in a Conflict Country

Clicks: 1
ID: 314457
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #970 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract While the pandemic has taken a toll on lives and livelihoods across the world, the impact on low-income countries in conflict can be significantly worse: Due to conflict, a large share of the already meager public expenditures is allocated to security, while public services are contained only within the areas that the government controls. Focusing on Afghanistan as a case study, this chapter discusses how the pandemic has further exacerbated the economic, health, and social conditions. It initially describes and evaluate the characteristics, coverage, and outcomes of the social protection system. It then traces the evolution and current state of the economy and poverty, reviews the state of health services, and estimates the effects of the pandemic based on a model specifically developed for Afghanistan regarding the impact on (a) GDP arising from domestic and regional factors (e.g., reduction in trade with trading partner countries as well as the repatriation of Afghan workers from those countries, and (b) the resulting impact on public revenues and the government’s (in)ability to provide an adequate health and social protection response amid continuing conflict, weak governance, and limited national outreach. The chapter concludes with proposals for social protection to (a) mitigate the humanitarian crisis from immediate impact of the pandemic on the general population, as well as the internally displaced and refugees, and (b) create a basis for building an adequate and feasible social protection system in the longer run.
Reference Key
openalex_W7161977088 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Şebnem Şahin, Zafiris Tzannatos
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197761465.013.0014
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.