Animal Management and Domestication: Andean and Amazonian Contexts
Clicks: 2
ID: 314450
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #1,232 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The Andes and the Amazon are two contrasting environments, but they have common processes related to human-animal relationships. In this work, we examine the history of these relationships, which encompass different chronologies in both regions. The available ethnographic information indicates complex modes of relationship, including common features (such as the concept of animal spirit) between animals and humans, which is a shared feature of the traditional societies in both regions. These common features are hunting, captivity, and domestication. We highlight the diversity of these local trajectories. Temporal trends in the relationship between people and animals are used as indicators of contrasting factors of the human attitudes to animals. In the Andes, camelid hunting and management characterized social strategies. Meanwhile, the use of aquatic resources, especially freshwater mollusks, as a construction material, was one of the main strategies of animal procurement. Also, processing marks are indicative of different cultural traditions in the processing of animal resources.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7162038864
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Hugo Yacobaccio, Gabriela Prestes-Carneiro |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195391367.013.32
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.