Measures of Micro-Segregation

Clicks: 3
ID: 314428
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #1,318 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Chapter 2 discusses measures that assess the separation of individuals from distinct social groups at a fine-grained spatial scale. It compares measurement along two dimensions, one based on the analytical lens used to assess segregation (whether through partitioning, sequencing, or geospatial location) and the other based on whether segregation occurs at an aggregate or disaggregate level. Considering these dimensions, the chapter evaluates the properties of six different types of measures, using both hypothetical scenarios and empirical applications to Black and white residential patterns within the historical United States. The discussion highlights research scenarios where some measures might be preferred over others.
Reference Key
openalex_W7162021409 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Martin Ruef, Angelina Grigoryeva
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oso/9780197841426.003.0002
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.