The Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿa , Maṣlaḥa , and Reforming Family Law
Clicks: 1
ID: 314413
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #1,158 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Several contemporary scholars have called upon the maqāṣid al-sharīʿa to reform Islamic law. Yet, when first conceptualized, the maqāṣid al-sharīʿa were theoretical principles that reflected the primary objectives of Islamic law and thus not an instrument for change. This chapter explores the legal tools scholars traditionally used, such as maṣlaḥa, to accommodate change. The chapter demonstrates, as a case study, how the Mālikī law school effectively employed maṣlaḥa through a substantive legal rationality when conceptualizing marriage. Consequently, unlike any other law school, they granted women judicial divorce on the grounds of harm and adaptively re-envisioned what harm could look like across time and space to accommodate different customary standards. These methods offer a paradigm for concretizing the abstract nature of the maqāṣid and reforming the law today.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7162002219
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Tesneem Alkiek |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197532805.013.52
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.