Ijtihād and Islamic Reform
Clicks: 1
ID: 314356
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #1,064 of 1,518 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,518 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Ijtihād is the most important source of the sharīʿa next to the revealed sources, namely, the Qurʾān and Sunna. One of the main differences between ijtihād and the revealed sources is that ijtihād proposes a continuous process of development, whereas revelation of the Qurʾān and Sunna discontinued with the demise of the Prophet Muhammad. Ijtihād thus remains the principal instrument by which to relate the sharīʿa to the changing conditions of society. As a vehicle of renewal and reform, ijtihād has always been dominated by its dual concern for continuity and change: continuity of the fundamentals of Islam while keeping also pace with the changing conditions of society. These two concerns have characterized the history and methodology of ijtihād and its role in the development of sharīʿa. The effort to reform Islam from within has suffered from the rigidities of conservatism, on the one hand, and the modernist demand for wider reforms, on the other. The chapter begins with a review of ijtihād-related terminologies, followed by the definition of ijtihād and how the Companions, Successors, and leading schools of law contributed to the methodology of ijtihād and development of the science of the sources of law, the uṣūl al-fiqh. Several supplementary topics that follow include: the scope and subject matter of ijtihād, qualification of a mujtahid, types of ijtihād, divisibility of ijtihād, decline of ijtihād, and contemporary ijtihād. New developments in ijtihād, including collective ijtihād (ijtihād jamā‘ī), multidisciplinary ijtihād, and greater emphasis on the higher purposes (maqasid) of sharīʿa, are discussed.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7161963600
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Mohammad Hāshim Kamali |
| Journal | Oxford University Press eBooks |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197532805.013.3
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.