Response to Yu, Wang, and Ge

Clicks: 5
ID: 314278
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #35 of 333 articles by views in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 333 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract is not available for this article.
Login to Search Abstract
Reference Key
openalex_W7161758157 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Yashasvini Sampathkumar, Ziad Zakaria, Kelli O’Connell, Jenna Bhimani, Victoria S Blinder, Rachael Burganowski, Isaac J. Ergas, Grace Gallagher, Jennifer J. Griggs, Narre Heon, Tatjana Kolevska, Yuriy Kotsurovskyy, Candyce H. Kroenke, Cecile A. Laurent, Raymond Liu, Maria J Monroy-Iglesias, Kanichi G. Nakata, Sonia Persaud, Janise M. Roh, Sara Tabatabai, Emily Valice, Peng Wang, Elisa V. Bandera, Erin J Aiello Bowles, Lawrence H. Kushi, Elizabeth D. Kantor
Journal JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jnci/djag150
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.