Small seeds and large knowledge gaps: understanding the regeneration traits of Brazilian savannah grasses necessary for restoration
Clicks: 2
ID: 314201
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #121 of 195 articles by views in Annals of botany
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 195 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Grasses (Poaceae) dominate the herbaceous layer of the species-rich Brazilian savannah (Cerrado), driving ecosystem functioning and fire regimes while facing severe threats from land-use conversion and cultivation of invasive forage grasses. Despite the recent expansion of ecological restoration and native grass seed production, knowledge gaps still hinder their use in savannah restoration. We conducted a scoping review to (i) map information and knowledge gaps related to regeneration traits of Cerrado grasses, (ii) evaluate trait coverage of species used in restoration projects, (iii) examine whether commercially available grasses represent a functionally homogeneous subset, and (iv) assess how ecological knowledge informs seed-based restoration. METHODS: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we screened 315 records identified, spanning seven regeneration niche phases (pre-dispersal, dispersal, germination, emergence, establishment, initial growth, and vegetative persistence) across 45 primary studies on native Cerrado Poaceae. A complementary dataset catalogued 24 grass species commercialized by two major native seed producers. KEY RESULTS: We identified 90 traits across 108 species (24 commercial). Germination traits dominated studies (85 species; 26 studies), while emergence, establishment, and initial growth remain severely understudied. Only 11 studies integrated ≥3 phases, and none covered >4. We found marked functional diversity across key regeneration traits, including seed mass, germinability and dispersal period. Contrary to expectations, commercially available species did not form a functionally homogeneous subset, but largely overlapped with non-commercial species, capturing broad functional variation. However, knowledge of commercial species is concentrated in a few taxa. CONCLUSIONS: Our scoping review revealed a strong bias towards germination traits in Cerrado grasses, with limited integration across other phases. Despite this, grasses are far from functionally uniform, showing substantial variation in regeneration strategies. Methodological variation across studies limits comparability and integration into ecological inference, leading to seed-based restoration practices that often rely on species whose key regeneration traits remain poorly understood.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7161817988
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Renata Rodrigues Paraguassu, Daniel Luis Mascia Vieira, Fabian Borghetti, Isabel Belloni Schmidt |
| Journal | Annals of botany |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/aob/mcag139
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.