Decomposing cultural differences in behavior toward members of different social groups
Clicks: 2
ID: 314065
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
0.3
/100
2 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #42 of 85 articles by views in PNAS nexus
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Prosocial behavior is a hallmark of human societies, yet its expression—and the benefits it confers—varies across cultures. While such variation is well documented, the underlying cognitive mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here we propose a decomposition of cultural differences in prosocial behavior into two key components: (i) social perception, capturing how cultural groups view others on dimensions of warmth and competence, and (ii) social valuation, reflecting how these perceptions influence the value of social actions. Using behavioral data from economic games involving participants in the U.S. and China (N = 5,428), we show strong evidence of a double dissociation at the level of between- and within-country variation: whereas social perception differences dominated in accounting for between-country differences, within-country differences were more driven by variation in social valuation. These findings offer a mechanistic account of cultural influences on prosocial behavior and highlight the value of computational approaches in cross-cultural research.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7161633394
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Jiashu Wang, Adrianna C Jenkins, Colin F Camerer, Ming Hsu, Jingjing Ma |
| Journal | PNAS nexus |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/pnasnexus/pgag172
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.