Prevalence of foot/ankle osteoarthritis and pain in retired male professional footballers compared to general population male controls: a cross-sectional study
Clicks: 2
ID: 313568
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #125 of 202 articles by views in Lara D. Veeken
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 202 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Objectives To examine whether retired male professional footballers have a higher risk of foot/ankle osteoarthritis (OA) and pain than general population male controls. Methods In this cross-sectional study, questionnaires for self-reported foot/ankle OA outcomes were posted to 878 footballers and 1060 controls, and subsequently a sample of responders per group underwent assessment for radiographic OA (ROA) irrespective of symptoms. ROA was defined using the La Trobe atlas when definite osteophyte (score ≥ 2) or definite joint space narrowing (score ≥ 2) was observed at any assessed foot/ankle joint. Symptomatic ROA (sROA) was defined as presence of ROA and pain in the same region of the foot for most days of the past month. Adjusted relative risks (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using robust Poisson regression. Results . 468 footballers (53%) and 619 controls (58%) completed questionnaires, of whom 113 footballers and 319 controls underwent radiographic assessment. Compared with controls, footballers were more likely to: (1) report General Practitioner diagnosed foot/ankle OA (aRR 1.77, 95% CI 1.22–2.57), forefoot/ankle surgery (aRR 2.80, 95% CI 2.04–3.84), and current foot/ankle pain (aRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.09–1.62); and (2) have foot/ankle ROA (aRR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.07) and sROA (aRR 1.63, 95% CI 1.21–2.19). Conclusion Retired male professional footballers were more likely to have self-reported and radiographic foot/ankle OA than general population male controls. The ankle appeared the joint most affected by OA in footballers compared with controls. Further study is needed in female footballers and to determine specific risk factors related to this increased risk.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7161495819
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ahmed Thanoon, Shima Espahbodi, Monirah Ali Shuaib, Bonnie Millar, Ashely Duncan, Catherine Bowen, Terence W O’Neill, Richard J. Wakefield, Fiona E. Watt, David A. Walsh, Gordon Fuller, Mark E. Batt, Sanjay M. Parekh, Gwen Fernandes, M Doherty, Weiya Zhang |
| Journal | Lara D. Veeken |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/rheumatology/keag250
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.