Comparison and verification methods to trace interaction-driven disturbances in galaxies

Clicks: 1
ID: 313481
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #500 of 900 articles by views in monthly notices of the royal astronomical society

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 900 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Low surface brightness tidal debris around galaxies, such as tails, streams, and shells, together with other interaction-driven morphological disturbances, serve as valuable indicators of past or ongoing galaxy mergers. With the growing data volume from surveys like the Vera C. Rubin Observatory’s Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST), automated detection methods are essential. This paper evaluates the performance of two automated methods, a Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) model and the Concentration-Asymmetry-Smoothness (CAS) parameter method, in tracing interaction-driven disturbances and merger signatures, with visual classification used as the benchmark. Visual classification yields a high-confidence disturbance fraction of 25.1 ± 1.5% in our sample and serves as the reference standard for assessing the completeness and precision of the automated approaches. Visual classification is affected by galaxy distance and image resolution, which limit the detectability of faint low surface brightness structures. The SSL model achieves high recall (0.86 ± 0.04) and low contamination (0.2) by retraining only its linear classifier on a small labelled dataset, making it suitable for identifying a broad set of disturbed systems, including faint tidal debris and other interaction-driven morphological disturbances, thereby providing a more complete census of merger-related features. The CAS method, using the traditional threshold A > 0.35, shows higher precision (0.77) but lower recall (0.20), indicating a conservative approach that captures cleaner but less complete samples. Visual classification and the SSL model show a significant positive correlation between stellar mass and disturbance fraction, while the CAS method exhibits a much weaker trend.
Reference Key
openalex_W7161292876 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Haotian Lyu, Sarah Brough, Aman Khalid, Alice Desmons, Elizaveta Sazonova
Journal monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/mnras/stag865
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag865
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.