Effect of mind mapping combined with the SBAR shift turnover model on reducing nursing defects during bedside shift turnovers after cardiac stenting in cardiology
Clicks: 1
ID: 310306
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #93 of 490 articles by views in Frontiers in surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 490 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
AimThis study aims to explore the effect of a mind mapping technique combined with the situation–background–assessment–recommendation (SBAR) shift turnover model on reducing nursing defects during bedside shift turnovers after cardiac stenting in cardiology.MethodsThis quasi-experimental study retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 96 patients who received cardiac stenting at our hospital between August 2022 and August 2023. According to the time of admission, patients were divided into an observation group (OG, n = 48) and a control group (CG, n = 48). Fourteen nurses participated in the study; they were matched by professional level and then randomly assigned to the OG and CG (n = 7 per group). The CG adopted the traditional mode of shift turnover. Based on the CG approach, the OG adopted a mind map combined with the SBAR shift turnover model. Outcomes compared between the two groups included the quality of shift turnover, nurses’ mastery of patient condition, handover time, defect rate of shift turnover, incidence of nursing adverse events and complaints, and patient satisfaction.ResultsCompared with the CG, the OG showed higher scores for shift turnover quality and nurses’ mastery of patient conditions, shorter handover time, and higher patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). The defect rate of shift turnover and the incidence of nursing adverse events and complaints were lower in the OG; however, these differences were not statistically significant.ConclusionIn this single-center study, integrating a mind map-supported SBAR handover into bedside shift handovers was associated with shorter handover time, fewer observed handover defects, and higher patient satisfaction. These findings suggest potential clinical benefits for communication safety after cardiac stenting; however, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the small nurse-level sample size and study design.
| Reference Key |
imported_1768925872_696faab088d55
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Miao, Rongrong |
| Journal | Frontiers in surgery |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.3389/fsurg.2025.1666274
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.