Complications and length of stay after enhanced recovery after surgery compared to conventional care in colorectal cancer patients in Northern Italy

Clicks: 1
ID: 310267
2025
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #435 of 490 articles by views in Frontiers in surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 490 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
BackgroundThis study aims to evaluate postoperative complications and length of stay in colorectal cancer patients undergoing ERAS vs. non-ERAS procedures in a population-based cohort in northern Italy.MethodsPatient characteristics (ASA, tumor site, stage, treatment, BMI) were used. Complications, stratified by Clavien-Dindo and length of stay (LOS), were reported. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to evaluate the difference between ERAS and non-ERAS patients.ResultsA total of 319 patients were included, divided into the non-ERAS group (113 patients) and the ERAS group (206 patients). Non-ERAS vs. ERAS group showed more complications (16.8% vs. 13.6%; p-value 0.44) and more days of hospitalization (7.3 vs. 4.8; p-value < 0.01), but less re-surgery (3.5% vs. 4.4%; p-value 0.72), new hospitalizations (3.5% vs. 5.8%; p-value 0.37) and death at 30 days (0.9% vs. 1.5%; p-value 0.66). Multivariate analysis revealed an increased risk in patients with ASA 4 [OR 6.6; 95% CI 1.9–22.6] and a modest, non-significant increase risk in the non-ERAS group [OR 1.3; 95% CI 0.7–2.5].ConclusionsERAS procedures appear to be able to allow intervention even in older patients and those with comorbidities, without compromising the results.
Reference Key
imported_1768925786_696faa5a2589e Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Mangone, Lucia
Journal Frontiers in surgery
Year 2025
DOI
10.3389/fsurg.2025.1694304
URL
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2025.1694304/full
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.