Clinical study on the effects of different cold compress methods and durations on postoperative complications following mandibular impacted third molar extraction
Clicks: 1
ID: 310170
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #430 of 490 articles by views in Frontiers in surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 490 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BackgroundTo optimize the postoperative cold compress protocol for mandibular impacted third molar extraction.MethodsSubjects were randomly divided into two major groups. The first group compared continuous vs. intermittent cold compress application, while the second group evaluated the duration of cold compress therapy. Postoperative outcomes, including pain intensity, facial swelling, trismus, and wound hemorrhage, were systematically analyzed.ResultsContinuous cold compress application within the first 6 h postoperatively demonstrated superior efficacy over intermittent application in alleviating pain, reducing swelling, improving mouth opening, and minimizing hemorrhage incidence. Cold compress application during postoperative D1 significantly controlled hemorrhage and mitigated acute pain. Prolonged therapy to D3 further enhanced facial edema reduction and trismus resolution.ConclusionsA protocol of continuous cold compress application for 6 h daily during the initial 3 postoperative days significantly reduces complications, offering optimal clinical outcomes.
| Reference Key |
imported_1768922274_696f9ca2201ec
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Qu, Pengfei |
| Journal | Frontiers in surgery |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.3389/fsurg.2025.1627139
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.