Comparative Outcomes of Robotic, Laparoscopic, and Open Hysterectomy for Complex Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study
Clicks: 1
ID: 310124
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #437 of 490 articles by views in Frontiers in surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 490 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background: The optimal surgical approach for hysterectomy in patients with complex large uteri remains controversial, particularly in those with uterine enlargement and obesity. This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and complication rates among three surgical techniques—open abdominal hysterectomy (LH), traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH), and Da Vinci robot-assisted hysterectomy (DV-RH)—to provide evidence for individualized surgical decision-making.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 444 patients who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases between April 2021 and April 2024 at the Ningxia Medical University General Hospital.Patients were divided into LH (n=140), TLH (n=179), and DV-RH (n=125) groups. Baseline, perioperative indicators, and the incidence of both short- and long-term complications among the three groups were compared. Additionally, BMI was stratified to compare the related indicators separately.Results: There were no significant differences in age, BMI, comorbidities, or surgical history among the groups. DV-RH showed significantly lower blood loss (P < 0.001), postoperative VAS scores (P < 0.001), and complication rates, especially in patients with uterine size ≥16 gestational weeks. TLH demonstrated comparable outcomes to DV-RH in selected indicators but had a higher incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade II complications (P = 0.032). Hospitalization costs were highest in the DV-RH group (P < 0.001).Conclusion: DV-RH offers superior perioperative outcomes in complex and large uterus cases but incurs higher costs. TLH remains a cost-effective alternative in appropriate patients. Surgical decisions should be based on patient characteristics, technical complexity, and institutional resources.
| Reference Key |
imported_1768922170_696f9c3adc168
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ha, Chunfang |
| Journal | Frontiers in surgery |
| Year | Year not found |
| DOI |
10.3389/fsurg.2025.1739304
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.