Clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery in bipolar transurethral vaporization of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Clicks: 1
ID: 310106
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #446 of 490 articles by views in Frontiers in surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 490 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
ObjectiveTo explore the clinical application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate (B-TUVP) and its impact on postoperative recovery.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 212 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) admitted to the Department of Urology of our hospital from January 2019 to December 2024. Among them, 121 patients were managed under an ERAS protocol (ERAS group), and 91 patients received traditional perioperative care (control group). The clinical characteristics included age, mean body mass index (BMI), preoperative comorbidities, prostate volume (PV), preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), preoperative Quality of Life (QoL) score, preoperative urinary flow rate, and urodynamic parameters. Preoperative management, intraoperative management, and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe clinical baseline data showed no significant differences between the two groups. Compared with the control group, the ERAS group had a significantly shorter duration of continuous bladder irrigation, time to first ambulation, and postoperative length of stay (P < 0.001). The total hospitalization costs were also significantly lower in the ERAS group compared to the control group (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups.ConclusionThe application of the ERAS protocol in B-TUVP can promote postoperative recovery, reduce the postoperative length of stay, and decrease total hospitalization costs. However, more prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to further validate the feasibility and effectiveness of this protocol.
Reference Key
imported_1768922120_696f9c08a4ca4 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Luo, Bingfeng
Journal Frontiers in surgery
Year 2025
DOI
10.3389/fsurg.2025.1702376
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.