Greenhouse Gas emissions in Maize agroecosystems of Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence Synthesis and Mitigation Insights
Clicks: 1
ID: 310013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #317 of 490 articles by views in Frontiers in surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 490 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Maize-based agroecosystems dominate food production across much of Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and are central to regional food security. At the same time, agricultural soils are important sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly nitrous oxide (N₂O), carbon dioxide (CO₂) and methane (CH₄), raising concerns about the climate impacts of maize intensification. Although a broad body of agronomic research in SSA has examined soil carbon dynamics, nitrogen cycling and productivity trade-offs, evidence based on field-measured GHG fluxes from maize systems remains limited. This review synthesises experimental, field-based studies that quantify CO₂, N₂O and CH₄ emissions from maize agroecosystems in SSA to characterise emission levels, identify key emission drivers and assess the mitigation potential of various management strategies. A PRISMA-guided systematic mapping and narrative synthesis was conducted using Web of Science and Scopus databases. Twenty-one field-based studies met the inclusion criteria and were analysed using bibliometric and thematic approaches. Across the reviewed studies, GHG emissions from maize systems in SSA were generally lower than those reported from high-input systems elsewhere, attributed to low nitrogen inputs and prevailing environmental conditions. Nitrogen management and soil moisture consistently emerged as dominant controls of N₂O emissions, which typically contributed most to overall global warming potential. Carbon dioxide fluxes were strongly influenced by tillage practices and residue management, while soils commonly acted as net sinks for CH₄, with episodic emissions during prolonged wet conditions. Evidence on conservation agriculture components points to context-dependent mitigation potential, with trade-offs among CO₂, N₂O and CH₄ varying by soil type, climate and management intensity. The review highlights the need for long-term, multi-site field experiments, particularly in underrepresented regions, to support the development of context-specific, climate-smart maize production strategies in SSA.
| Reference Key |
imported_1768911323_696f71dbf2d18
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Cardenas, Laura M |
| Journal | Frontiers in surgery |
| Year | Year not found |
| DOI |
10.3389/fagro.2026.1748080
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.