Analysis of risk factors and linear prediction model construction for prolonged mechanical ventilation after Stanford A-type aortic dissection
Clicks: 1
ID: 309953
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #381 of 490 articles by views in Frontiers in surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 490 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors for prolonged acute ventilation time after Stanford type A aortic dissection and to construct a nomogram prediction model.MethodsA total of 178 patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection admitted to the Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from 2020 to 2024 were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were randomly divided into a modeling group (124 cases) and a validation group (54 cases) at a 7:3 ratio. Risk factors for prolonged mechanical ventilation time after surgery were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and a risk prediction model was constructed based on the results of multivariate logistic regression analysis.ResultsMultivariate logistic regression analysis showed that age, body mass index, preoperative oxygenation index, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and postoperative serum creatinine were risk factors for prolonged mechanical ventilation time after Stanford type A aortic dissection (p < 0.05).A risk prediction model was constructed based on these findings. The area under the ROC curve was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.86–0.97), with an accuracy of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81–0.93), sensitivity of 0.92 (95%CI: 0.86–0.98), specificity of 0.82 (95%CI: 0.71–0.92), and an optimal cut-off value of 0.527. The results of model validation showed that the area under the ROC curve was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.66–0.92), with an accuracy of 0.72 (95%CI: 0.58–0.84), sensitivity of 0.77 (95%CI: 0.64–0.90), specificity of 0.6 (95%CI: 0.35–0.85).ConclusionThe prediction model for prolonged mechanical ventilation time in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection has a good prediction effect and is convenient for clinical use, providing a reference for medical workers to take preventive treatment.
| Reference Key |
imported_1768907611_696f635bc21cd
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Wang, Yali |
| Journal | Frontiers in surgery |
| Year | 2025 |
| DOI |
10.3389/fsurg.2025.1697977
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.