From open to robotic surgery in pediatric ureteral reimplantation: overcoming the learning curve for improved outcomes

Clicks: 1
ID: 309929
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #194 of 490 articles by views in Frontiers in surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 490 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
IntroductionWith growing role of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (LUR) and robotic ureteral reimplantation (RALUR) have gained popularity in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) treatment. However, literature on complex ureterovesical junction (UVJ) pathologies remains limited. This study reports RALUR outcomes over time and compares them with those of LUR and open ureteral reimplantation (OUR) for UVJ pathologies at a tertiary center.Materials and methodsData from 80 RALUR (18 non dismembered ND-RALUR and 62 dismembered D-RALUR) performed in 2018–2023 were prospectively collected and compared with data from 21 LUR (16 non dismembered ND-LUR and 5 dismembered D-LUR) in 2018–2020 and 61 OUR in 2014–2021. Surgical indications included VUR, obstructive megaureter (OM), and refluxing obstructive megaureter (ROM), even in duplex system, bladder diverticula, ureterocele and prior UVJ surgeries.ResultsMedian age and weight were 2.1 years, 12 kg (OUR), 1.7 years, 13.5 kg (LUR), and 3.3 years, 15.0 kg (RALUR). No intraoperative complications occurred. Abdominal drainage and bladder catheterization were more frequent and lasted longer in OUR than in RALUR (p < 0.001). RALUR was associated with shorter hospitalization and reduced analgesic use (p < 0.001). Success rates were 79% (OUR), 50% (LUR), and 65% (RALUR), improving to 97%, 95%, and 98% after reinterventions. RALUR success increased from 55% (2020–2021) to 81% (2022–2023) (p = 0.02).DiscussionRALUR achieved comparable success to OUR and LUR while offering improved ergonomics, useful for complex cases, shorter hospital stays, and easier future endoscopic approaches. The increasing success rate reflects the robotic learning curve and growing surgical expertise.
Reference Key
imported_1768904092_696f559cecd51 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Fiorenza, V.
Journal Frontiers in surgery
Year 2025
DOI
10.3389/fsurg.2025.1573233
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.