Biochemical Markers of Bone Turnover, Endogenous Hormones and the Risk of Fractures in Postmenopausal Women: The OFELY Study

Clicks: 3
ID: 307592
2000
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #47 of 119 articles by views in journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the american society for bone and mineral research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract The mechanisms leading to increased bone loss and skeletal fragility in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis are still poorly understood. Increased bone resorption, low serum estradiol and high serum sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) recently have been reported as predictors of vertebral and hip fractures in elderly women. In a cohort of healthy untreated younger postmenopausal women aged 50–89 years (mean, 64 years), we compared baseline levels of bone markers and endogenous hormones in 55 women who subsequently had a fracture (20 vertebral and 35 peripheral fractures) with levels in the 380 women who did not fracture during a mean 5 years of follow-up. Women with levels in the highest quartile of four bone resorption markers including urinary-free deoxypyridinoline (D-Pyr), urinary type I collagen N-telopeptides (NTX), and urinary and serum type I collagen C-telopeptides (CTX) had about a 2-fold increased risk of fractures compared with women with levels in the three lowest quartiles with relative risk (RR) and 95% CI of 1.8 (1.0-3.4) for free D-Pyr, 1.7 (0.9-3.2) for urinary NTX, 2.3 (1.3-4.1) for urinary CTX, and 2.1 (1.2-3.8) for serum CTX. Serum levels of bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) in the highest quartile were associated with an RR of fracture of 2.4 (1.3-4.2). Women with serum levels of estradiol and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) sulfate in the lowest quartile had an RR of fracture of 2.2 (1.2-4.0) and 2.1 (1.2-3.8), respectively. Increased levels of SHBG and intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) were moderately associated with an increased risk of fracture. Similar results were obtained when the analysis was restricted to symptomatic vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Adjustment of biochemical markers by hormone levels did not significantly alter the results. Women with both high bone resorption markers and low estradiol (or low DHEA sulfate) had a higher risk of fracture with RRs of 3.0-3.3 (p < 0.001). After adjustment for bone mineral density (BMD) of the hip, spine, radius, or total body, bone markers and hormones were still predictive of fracture risk with similar RRs. We conclude that high levels of some biochemical markers of bone turnover, low serum estradiol, low DHEA sulfate, high SHBG, and high PTH are associated with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture in postmenopausal women, independently of each other and of BMD. The mechanism by which some postmenopausal women have an increased rate of bone turnover leading to an increased risk of fracture remains to be elucidated.
Reference Key
openalex_W2062781570 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Patrick Garnero, Elisabeth Sornay‐Rendu, Bruno Claustrat, Pierre D. Delmas
Journal journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the american society for bone and mineral research
Year 2000
DOI
10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1526
URL
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1526
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.