The ESHRE/ESGE consensus on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies
Clicks: 3
ID: 307260
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #93 of 98 articles by views in human reproduction (oxford, england)
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
STUDY QUESTIONWhat classification system is more suitable for the accurate, clear, simple and related to the clinical management categorization of female genital anomalies?
| Reference Key |
openalex_W2141418885
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Grigoris Grimbizis, Stephan Gordts, Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo, Sara Y. Brucker, C. De Angelis, Marco Gergolet, Tin Chiu Li, Vasilios Tanos, Hans A.M. Brölmann, Luca Gianaroli, R. Campo |
| Journal | human reproduction (oxford, england) |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
10.1093/humrep/det098
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.