Mechanism of the chlorination of benzene in the electrolytic cell

Clicks: 1
ID: 307004
1913
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #7,576 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Activity monitors are increasingly used to assess physical activity. We aimed to compare wearing time and walking between two activity monitors in COPD. Fifty four patients (FEV1 62±22%pred, 6MWD 495±138m) wore the Actigraph (AG) and Dynaport (DP) twice for 14 days with 14 days in between, in the frame of the PROactive project. Wearing time (h/d); walking time(min/d) of DP (DPWT) and steps/day of AG (AGsteps) were retrieved. Calculations were done on the mean wearing and walking variables obtained over 28 days (Inter-patient correlations). Intra-patient correlations were calculated over the 28 days obtained in each patient, as well as between mean weekly values of the 4 weeks (6 contrasts). Results: wearing time of the AG and DP were strongly related (R=0.80 p<0.001). Despite being worn on the same belt the DP reported 83±69min more wearing time (p<0.001). Mean DPWT and AGsteps related strongly (R=0.90 p<0.001). Median day-by-day correlations between AGsteps and DPWT was 0.88 (IQR 0.75 to 0.95). Week-to-week variability was large (AGsteps 424 range -8412 to 8083; DPWT 6 range -79 to 120min). Median correlations of differences in 6 weekly PA levels, (n=39) was good (median R=0.88 IQR 0.71 to 0.98). These data show that both monitors provide comparable outcomes and are capable of measuring differences between separate weeks of assessment. The difference in wearing time needs clarification.
Reference Key
openalex_W2322694161 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors R. G. Van Name, C. H. Maryott
Journal american journal of science
Year 1913
DOI
10.2475/ajs.s4-35.206.153
URL
https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.s4-35.206.153
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.