Superimposition of the drainage in central Texas

Clicks: 3
ID: 306951
1890
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #6,490 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract

Background

Carotid plaque (CP) detected by ultrasonography and carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) are useful surrogate markers for subclinical atherosclerosis and good predictors of cardiovascular disease in the general population and rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Objectives

Our aim was to determine if cIMT may predict the presence of carotid plaques.

Methods

We evaluated 670 RA patients from NW Spain without previous history cardiovascular events. Carotid ultrasonography was performed by a MyLab 70 scanner (Esaote; Genoa, Italy), equipped with 7–12 MHz linear transducer and the automated software guided technique radiofrequency – Quality Intima Media Thickness in real-time (QIMT, Esaote, Maastricht, Holland). The cIMT was determined as the average of three measurements in each common carotid artery. The final cIMT was the largest average cIMT (left or right). Carotid plaque was defined according to the Manheim Consensus Conference criteria. Based on studies reported in non-rheumatic patients, a cIMT was considered as associated with high cardiovascular risk if it was ≥0.90 mm.

Results

Unilateral and bilateral carotid plaque frequency and cIMT values are summarized in table 1. cIMT values were 0.619±0.105 mm in patients without plaques and 0.774 ± 0.161 mm in those with plaques (p<0.001). Using 0.90 mm as the cIMT cut-off value for high cardiovascular risk, the sensitivity to detect carotid plaques was 21.2% and the specificity 99%. A ROC curve comparing the presence of carotid plaque and cIMT was performed, being the area under the curve 0.795. The best cIMT cut-off point to determine the presence of plaques was considered as the one with the highest sensitivity and specificity. According to that, 0.670 mm was found to be the best cut-off point, being sensitivity and specificity for plaque detection 71.9% and 74% respectively. Positive predictive value for a cIMT ≥0.670 mm was 78.3% in our population, being 66.8% the negative predictive value. Regarding bilateral plaques, a cIMT cut-off value of 0.90 mm had sensitivity of 27.7% and specificity of 96.6%. The ROC curve showed that the best cut-off point for bilateral plaque detection was also 0.670 mm with sensitivity 79.1% and specificity 64.2%.

Conclusions

In Spanish RA patients cIMT ≥0.670 mm is a good predictor of carotid plaques. Our study suggests the possibility of considering a cIMT lower than 0.90 mm as a predictor of high cardiovascular risk in RA.

Disclosure of Interest

None declared
Reference Key
openalex_W2321751871 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ralph S. Tarr
Journal american journal of science
Year 1890
DOI
10.2475/ajs.s3-40.239.359
URL
https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.s3-40.239.359
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.