Remarks on Glyptocrinus and Reteocrinus, two genera of Silurian crinoids
Clicks: 2
ID: 306229
1883
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #5,632 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
IN the second part of our Revision of the Palreocrinoidea, at page 185, and following, we undertook to define the character and relations of Glyptocrinu8 and allied genera, in such a manner as to render it possible to group the species thereunder with some approach to their natural order.As is well known to everyone who has attempted to identify the species, the American Silurian Crinoids are an extremely difficult group to understand.There are a few well marked sJ)ecies, of which ample collections have been made in Ohio and Indiana, but a large number of species have been described by Billings, Hall and others, from very meagre and imperfect material.Of many of these forms specimens are exceedingly rare, and we are often obliged to rely upon illustrations which are unsatisfactory, and descriptions which are necessarily defective in the delineation of specific and even generic characteristics.Under these circumstances it was scarcely to be expected that our conclusions would prove entirely satisfactory, even to ourselves.Our treatment of the genera Glyptocrinus and Reteocrinus has been somewhat sharpl'y criticized by Mr. S. A. Miller, in the Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History for April, 1882, in connection with the description of some new species un-
| Reference Key |
openalex_W2313897919
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Charles Wachsmuth, Frank Springer |
| Journal | american journal of science |
| Year | 1883 |
| DOI |
10.2475/ajs.s3-25.148.255
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.