Thoughts on Agenda Setting, Framing, and Priming

Clicks: 2
ID: 306013
2007
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #96 of 96 articles by views in journal of communications

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This article discusses similarities and differences between "second-level" agenda setting and framing, and between priming and agenda setting. It presents data on the number of studies of agenda setting, framing, and priming indexed by Communication Abstract from 1971 to 2005, and it offers some conclusions about the cognitive processes involved in agenda setting, priming and framing.
Reference Key
openalex_W2158984626 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors David H. Weaver
Journal journal of communications
Year 2007
DOI
10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x
URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.x
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.