Late Cretaceous Uplift of Grand Canyon: Evidence From Fluid Inclusions
Clicks: 3
ID: 305342
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #7,588 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
For over a century, the history of Grand Canyon has been of interest to many. In recent years, debates have centered around the hypothesis that Grand Canyon formed during the late Cretaceous, not the Miocene, as previously thought. In this study, fluid inclusions within carbonates from the Mauv, Redwall, Supai, and Kaibab Fms. from Grand Canyon yield entrapment temperatures between 135 and 60 °C. Comparison of these temperature to time-temperature histories based on thermochronology (U-Th/He and fission track) from nearby samples suggest that these carbonates had fluids trapped within them from 89 to 58 Ma and that major denudation of late Cretaceous strata occurred during this interval. Regionally derived burial histories and local thermochronology suggest that significant uplift of Grand Canyon and the adjacent Colorado Plateau occurred during the late Cretaceous. We interpret the timing of fluid entrapment, denudation of Cretaceous strata, and burial histories to be consistent with initial uplift associated with the early stages of formation of Grand Canyon during the late Cretaceous. Models of uplift of northern Arizona exclusively during the Cenozoic are inconsistent with these data.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W4398782049
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Laura L. Barnett, Peter Copeland, Virginia B. Sisson, Steve Naruk |
| Journal | american journal of science |
| Year | 2024 |
| DOI |
10.2475/001c.116737
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.