The Assabet barcode: Mesoproterozoic detrital zircons in Neoproterozoic strata from Mauritania, West Africa

Clicks: 2
ID: 302420
2022
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #3,423 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Detrital zircon data are reported from Mesoproterozoic to Ordovician strata from two tectonic domains in Mauritania: 14 samples from the Taoudeni Basin of the West African Craton and 15 samples from the Mauritanide orogen. Taoudeni Basin samples show four sequential, distinctive detrital zircon age distributions, which we refer to as "barcodes". From old to young these are the Char, Assabet, Téniagouri, and Oujeft barcodes, each named for a constituent stratigraphic unit. Zircon age maxima are as follows, with the dominant ones in italics. The Char barcode, from Mesoproterozoic (ca. 1100 Ma) strata including the Char Group, yielded zircon age maxima at 2941, 2871, 2703, 2447, 2076, and 2041 Ma, all potentially traceable to sources in the West African Craton. The Assabet barcode is from strata, including the eponymous Assabet el Hassiane Group, that were deposited between ca. 883 and ca. 570 Ma; it has age maxima at 2137, 2053, 1769, 1510, 1212, 1021, and 936 Ma and a pronounced minimum during Geon 16 (1699–1600 Ma). The Assabet9s Mesoproterozoic to early Neoproterozoic zircons cannot have come from the West African Craton or any of its surrounding orogens. The Téniagouri barcode, which takes its name from the Téniagouri Group, was deposited at ca. 569 Ma; it has dominant maxima at 1983, 1872, 1522, 1215, 1109, 988, and 601 Ma and resembles the Assabet barcode but with the addition of the youngest population. The Oujeft barcode, named for the Oujeft Group, is from strata deposited between 541 or slightly earlier and 444 Ma or younger, has age maxima at 2124, 2053, 1197, 624 and 579 Ma. The Téniagouri and Oujeft barcodes record input from Pan-African orogens. In the Mauritanide orogen, most of the metasedimentary rock units that were sampled yielded detrital zircon age spectra that match one of the Taoudeni Basin barcodes. These results imply new depositional age constraints based on barcode correlation and suggest affinities between Mauritanide strata and the West African Craton. Detrital zircon age distributions that broadly resemble the Assabet barcode occur in the Neoproterozoic of Morocco, Ghana, Greece, Russia, Brazil, and, in the Appalachian orogen of Canada and the United States, Avalonia and Ganderia. The recent Rodinia reconstruction of Evans (2021) restores these far-flung localities to a more compact area, with Avalonia, Ganderia, and other peri-Gondwanan terranes occupying an oblong area between Amazonia, Laurentia, Baltica, and West Africa. Our preferred explanation is that most of these places received detritus via the same continent-scale fluvial system as the West African craton. Among the craton9s nearest Rodinia neighbors in the Evans (2021) reconstruction for 900 Ma, Amazonia has known igneous rocks corresponding to all of the major Assabet age populations, and also a lull, though not a complete magmatic gap, during Geon 16. This is consistent with overall north-directed paleocurrents in the Assabet El Hassiane Group and its correlatives on the West African Craton.
Reference Key
openalex_W4313563857 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Dwight C. Bradley, David A.D. Evans, Paul B. O’Sullivan, Cliff D. Taylor, B. M. Eglington
Journal american journal of science
Year 2022
DOI
10.2475/08.2022.01
URL
https://doi.org/10.2475/08.2022.01
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.