Review: Women and Human Development
Clicks: 3
ID: 302215
2003
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #50 of 61 articles by views in thinking through fairbairn: exploring the object relations model of mind
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
1Faculty of History, Cambridge University, King's College, Cambridge CB2 1ST, UK Women and Human Development Martha C. Nussbaum Cambridge Cambridge University Press 2000 xxi + 312 Hardback£17.95
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (24 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W2330132534
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | M. Lane |
| Journal | thinking through fairbairn: exploring the object relations model of mind |
| Year | 2003 |
| DOI |
10.1093/mind/112.446.372
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.