On the relationship of the Pleistocene to the pre-Pleistocene formations of the Mississippi Basin, south of the limit of glaciation

Clicks: 1
ID: 301979
1891
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #6,466 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
THE deposits made by the ice and by the waters which •originated from it dUl'lng the ~lacial period, possess a character so unique, and so markedly unlike that of the underlying formations within the glaciated area of the United States, that there has been little difficulty in discriminating between them.There have been differences of opinion as to the relative importance of the val'iolls agencies which are believed to have been operative in the production of the drift, and in some minor measure these differences still exist.But whether the drift of any particular region be believed to be the work of glaciers, or of icebergs or ice-floes, or of glacionatant lakes or streall1s, or the j.oillt wOl'k of two or more of these agencies.still the drift, as snch, is clearly defined from the underlying stmta.In many regions, this is true no less of the valley drift which stretches beyond the glaciated area along the avenues of discharge for the melting ice, than of the unmodified drift upon the extra-\'alley lands farther to the north, where the drift agent is believed to have been land ice.* The writers have worked in sllch close association in the study of this and of correlated regions.that it is difficult to define their individual work and their respective responsibilities; nor is it important; but they have reasons for statinA' that the preliminary determination of the salient featnres of the correlation, and the direction of the investigation, are largely the work of Mr. Chamberlin, while the detailed investigation, the elaboration of results, and the preparation of this article are chiefly the work of Mr. Salisbury.
Reference Key
openalex_W2331080689 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors T. C. Chamberlin, Rollin D. Salisbury
Journal american journal of science
Year 1891
DOI
10.2475/ajs.s3-41.245.359
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.