Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What Is ‘Strong Objectivity’?

Clicks: 1
ID: 301329
1996
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #690 of 1,517 articles by views in Oxford University Press eBooks

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,517 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract For almost two decades, feminists have engaged in a complex and charged conversation about objectivity. Its topics have included which kinds of knowledge projects have it, which don’t, and why they don’t; whether the many different feminisms need it, and if so why they do; and if it is possible to get it, how to do so. This conversation has been informed by complex and charged prefeminist writings that tend to get stuck in debates between empiricists and intentionalists, objectivists and interpretationists, and realists and social constructionists (including poststructuralists).
Reference Key
openalex_W4388071804 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sandra Harding
Journal Oxford University Press eBooks
Year 1996
DOI
10.1093/oso/9780198751458.003.0016
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198751458.003.0016
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.