Orogeny and geochronology

Clicks: 2
ID: 301151
1966
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #8,265 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Reporting a radiometric date of a hypogene mineral or plutonic rock as a date of orogeny is unjustified. Many orogenies proceed without associated plutonism and many plutonic events take place without orogeny. Stratigraphic terms should not be used for tectonic or plutonic events unless the events are concurrent with the deposition of the strata. The term 9Grenville9 has become meaningless because it has been used as a stratigraphic, provincial, tectonic and orogenic term spanning a great length of time and obscuring the tectonic and plutonic events of the Precambrian. 9Grenville9 should be used as a stratigraphic term only and new names coined for restricted plutonic and tectonic events which involve rocks of the Grenville series.
Reference Key
openalex_W2166328012 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors James Gilluly
Journal american journal of science
Year 1966
DOI
10.2475/ajs.264.2.97
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.