Protection by BCG Vaccine Against Tuberculosis: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Clicks: 6
ID: 301005
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #228 of 532 articles by views in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 532 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background. Randomized trials assessing BCG vaccine protection against tuberculosis have widely varying results, for reasons that are not well understood. Methods. We examined associations of trial setting and design with BCG efficacy against pulmonary and miliary or meningeal tuberculosis by conducting a systematic review, meta-analyses, and meta-regression. Results. We identified 18 trials reporting pulmonary tuberculosis and 6 reporting miliary or meningeal tuberculosis. Univariable meta-regression indicated efficacy against pulmonary tuberculosis varied according to 3 characteristics. Protection appeared greatest in children stringently tuberculin tested, to try to exclude prior infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis or sensitization to environmental mycobacteria (rate ratio [RR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], .18–.37), or infants (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, .29–.58). Protection was weaker in children not stringently tested (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, .35–1.01) and older individuals stringently or not stringently tested (RR, 0.88; 95% CI, .59–1.31 and RR, 0.81; 95% CI, .55–1.22, respectively). Protection was higher in trials further from the equator where environmental mycobacteria are less and with lower risk of diagnostic detection bias. These associations were attenuated in a multivariable model, but each had an independent effect. There was no evidence that efficacy was associated with BCG strain. Protection against meningeal and miliary tuberculosis was also high in infants (RR, 0.1; 95% CI, .01–.77) and children stringently tuberculin tested (RR, 0.08; 95% CI, .03–.25). Conclusions. Absence of prior M. tuberculosis infection or sensitization with environmental mycobacteria is associated with higher efficacy of BCG against pulmonary tuberculosis and possibly against miliary and meningeal tuberculosis. Evaluations of new tuberculosis vaccines should account for the possibility that prior infection may mask or block their effects.
Reference Key
openalex_W2010318115 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Punam Mangtani, Ibrahim Abubakar, Cono Ariti, Rebecca Beynon, Laura Pimpin, Paul Fine, Laura C. Rodrigues, Peter G. Smith, Marc Lipman, Penny Whiting, Jonathan Sterne
Journal Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Year 2013
DOI
10.1093/cid/cit790
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.