Measuring Sleep: Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Wrist Actigraphy Compared to Polysomnography
Clicks: 4
ID: 300591
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.9
/100
4 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #57 of 189 articles by views in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 189 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We validated actigraphy for detecting sleep and wakefulness versus polysomnography (PSG).
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (11 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W2092938587
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Miguel Marino, Yi Li, Michael Rueschman, John W. Winkelman, J. M. Ellenbogen, Jo M. Solet, Hilary Dulin, Lisa Berkman, Orfeu M. Buxton |
| Journal | Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
10.5665/sleep.3142
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.