Redetermination and reevaluation of compositional variations in metamorphosed sediments of the Littleton Formation, New Hampshire

Clicks: 2
ID: 298747
1995
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #3,470 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
In a study of metamorphosed pelites of the Devonian-aged Littleton Formation, New Hampshire, Shaw (1954) found little evidence for large scale compositional change other than devolatilization. Because his data are still used for such studies, we have reanalyzed his original samples using more precise methods and for additional elements to provide a more useful data set. Since Shaw’s study, remapping in New Hampshire has shown that 21 samples from the original set of 67 appear to be from underlying Silurian formations. The new data for the remaining 46 Littleton samples show statistically unambiguous differences between sample sets in average concentration ratios to Al2O3 or TiO2 for several elements (on a loss-on-ignition-free basis). The data do not, however, show systematic compositional differences as a function of metamorphic grade. Variations in element concentrations within sample sets of low, medium, and high metamorphic grade are as large or larger than differences in average concentrations between pairs of sample sets. This renders the method of comparing average compositions intrinsically insensitive even to substantial compositional change during metamorphism. We find no compelling evidence in support of metamorphic gain or loss of the elements we studied, but taken at face value, the statistical uncertainties would allow considerable gain or loss of most elements during metamorphism of Littleton pelites. Further detailed sampling would be required to determine whether the samples of each metamorphic grade are representative and to interpret the compositional variations and differences accurately in terms of metamorphic element mobility on the one hand and inheritance from the heterogeneous sedimentary protolith on the other.
Reference Key
openalex_W2334600099 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors B. E. Moss, L. A. Haskin, R. F. Dymek, Denis M. Shaw
Journal american journal of science
Year 1995
DOI
10.2475/ajs.295.8.988
URL
https://ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/60701.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.