Fluid-mineral Equilibrium Under Nonhydrostatic Stress: Insight From Molecular Dynamics

Clicks: 3
ID: 298695
2024
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #7,177 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The interpretation of phase equilibria and reactions in geological materials is based on standard thermodynamics that assumes hydrostatic and homogeneous stress conditions. However, rocks and minerals in the lithosphere can support stress gradients and nonhydrostatic stresses. Currently, there is still not an accepted macroscopic thermodynamic theory to include the effect of nonhydrostatic stress on mineral reactions, and the use of several thermodynamic potentials in stressed geological system remains under debate. In experiments under nonhydrostatic stress, it is often difficult to resolve the direct effect of differential stress on phase equilibria because pressure gradients may be developed. Such gradients can affect the metamorphic equilibria at the local scale. Here, we investigate the direct effect of a homogeneous, nonhydrostatic stress field on the solid-fluid equilibrium using molecular dynamics simulations at non-zero pressure and elevated temperature conditions. Our results show that, for simple single-component systems at constant temperature, the equilibrium fluid pressure of a stressed system is always larger than the value of fluid pressure at hydrostatic stress conditions. The displacement of the equilibrium value of the fluid pressure is about an order of magnitude smaller compared to the level of differential stress in the solid crystal. Thus, phase equilibria can be accurately predicted by taking the fluid pressure as a proxy of the equilibration pressure. On the contrary, the mean stress of the solid can deviate substantially from the pressure of the fluid in stressed systems at thermodynamic equilibrium. This has implications on the use of thermodynamic pressure in geodynamic models since the fluid pressure is a more accurate proxy for predicting the location of metamorphic reactions, while the equilibrium density of the solid has to be determined from its mean stress.
Reference Key
openalex_W4392083212 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Mattia L. Mazzucchelli, Evangelos Moulas, Boris Kaus, Thomas Speck
Journal american journal of science
Year 2024
DOI
10.2475/001c.92881
URL
https://doi.org/10.2475/001c.92881
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.