Response by Editor-in-Chief.
Clicks: 71
ID: 29847
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
53.8
/100
71 views
58 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #39 of 41 articles by views in Journal of advanced nursing
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
I am very grateful to Drs Clifton and Banks for their editorial. With specific reference to the editorial by McCrae and Portes (2019) and the editorial processes involved, reviewer comments were obtained for the initial submission and discussed by two of the editors. The journal manager at Wiley also provided input on the piece. We did not consider that the paper supported publication as a full article but, given the currency of the issue and its importance for nursing, invited the authors to submit an attenuated piece as an editorial. Nevertheless, regardless of the process, the sole responsibility for the content of JAN lies with the Editor-in-Chief. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
| Reference Key |
watson2019responsejournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Watson, Roger; |
| Journal | Journal of advanced nursing |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1111/jan.14159
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.