Frost-heaved tussocks in Massachusetts

Clicks: 3
ID: 298035
1951
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #5,051 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract

Abstract

Background

Clinical education has moved to a “competency-based” model with an emphasis on workplace-based learning and assessment which, in turn, depends on feedback to be effective. Further, the understanding of feedback has changed from information about a performance directed to the learner performing the task, to a dialogue, which enables the learner to act and develop. In health professional education, feedback is a complex interaction between trainee, supervisor and the healthcare system. Most published research on feedback in health professional education originates in Europe and North America. Our interest is on the impact of culture on this process, particularly in the context of Asian cultures. A realist approach looks at complex interventions in social situations, and so would seem appropriate lens to use to examine the influence of cultural factors on utilising feedback.

Methods

An initial search has been performed to define the scope of the review question and develop our candidate / “best guess” program theory. The formal electronic search was carried out in February 2020 and included: CINAHL, ERIC, MEDLINE, and PsycInfo, and repeated in October 2020. Retrieved articles were imported into Covidence for screening and data extraction, after which components of the Context – Mechanisms – Outcomes configurations will be sought to refine the initial program theory.

Discussion

Feedback has been recognised as critically important in competency-based health professional education, yet feedback is a complex, socially based “intervention”. Most of the published literature on feedback originates from “Western” cultures. This protocol aims to provide further information that may lead to improving the usefulness of feedback in the South East Asian region.

Systematic Review Registration

Registration was sought with PROSPERO and advice given was that this review was not eligible for registration as it did not have a “direct and clinically-relevant health-related outcome”.

ARTICLE SUMMARY

Strengths and limitations of this study

A Realist approach potentially best explains the complexities of Culture’s impact on feedback. To our knowledge, there are few studies of feedback seeking and provision to health professional trainees in Asia. In addition to formal literature database searches, we will need to conduct citation mining to locate other relevant resources. The typical assessment of “Risk of bias” does not apply to the Realist approach.
Reference Key
openalex_W2321508707 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Robert S. Sigafoos, David M. Hopkins
Journal american journal of science
Year 1951
DOI
10.2475/ajs.249.4.312
URL
https://ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/58343.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.