The thermochronologic record of erosion and magmatism in the Canyonlands region of the Colorado Plateau

Clicks: 2
ID: 297069
2019
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #6,055 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The Cenozoic history of crustal deformation, surface uplift, and erosion of the central Colorado Plateau (southwestern USA) is distinct from and relatively poorly understood compared with surrounding regions in the North American Cordillera, including the Grand Canyon region and the southwestern Plateau margin. Here, we present new apatite thermochronologic results from Paleozoic-Mesozoic sandstones sampled in the Canyonlands region---the interior of the Colorado Plateau in southeastern Utah. The apatite (U-Th-Sm)/He (He) ages are highly dispersed, with both positive-slope and negative-slope age-effective U (eU) trends. Samples with apatite He results suitable for thermal history modeling are from the Abajo and La Sal mountains intrusive complexes and the Permian, Triassic, and Jurassic rocks sampled near the Colorado River at Lees Ferry, Arizona, and Hite, Utah. Samples with the richest thermal history information have positive-slope apatite He age-\[eU\] trends, with ages *ca*. 10 to 5 Ma at \[eU\] \< 10 ppm and *ca*. 25 to 20 Ma at \[eU\] \> 60 ppm. Modeled thermal histories that best predict this pattern require two periods of rock cooling: one during the middle Cenozoic *ca*. 30 to 20 Ma and the other since the latest Miocene *ca*. 6 Ma. The most recent cooling documents the transition from a slowly eroding Miocene landscape to recent rapid erosion that likely postdates 6 Ma and the integration of the modern Colorado River. Middle Cenozoic rock cooling can be attributed to either ∼1 km of erosion between *ca*. 25 and 15 Ma, as previous workers have suggested in other parts of the Colorado Plateau region, or relaxation of a geothermal gradient transiently doubled by magmatism associated with the vigorous magmatic flare-up that swept through the region *ca*. 34 to 20 Ma. The ambiguity of using middle Cenozoic rock cooling as a proxy for erosion in this region means that this event should be described using a nongenetic term: the Middle Cenozoic Cooling Event.
Reference Key
openalex_W2958493572 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kendra E. Murray, Peter W. Reiners, Stuart N. Thomson, Xavier Robert, K. X. Whipple
Journal american journal of science
Year 2019
DOI
10.2475/05.2019.01
URL
https://doi.org/10.2475/05.2019.01
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.