Eocene drainage evolution and erosion of the Sierra Nevada batholith across northern California and Nevada

Clicks: 5
ID: 296837
2012
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #343 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Detrital zircon analysis of Eocene to Oligocene fluvial sediments ("auriferous gravels") in the Yuba and Feather River drainages, northern California, provides new constraints on the evolution of the paleo-drainage system, sediment provenance, and the timing of sediment deposition and erosion of the Sierra Nevada batholith. 1292 new detrital zircon U-Pb ages in 14 samples indicate a regional shift in sediment provenance, from local sources, predominantly the youngest phase of Sierra Nevada arc magmatism, to basement terranes and extra-regional sources. The majority of samples contain zircon from one of two distinct Mesozoic sources, as well as 5 to 30 percent Precambrian grains, reflecting derivation from both the Sierra Nevada batholith and basement metamorphic belts of the northern Sierra Nevada (for example, Shoo Fly Complex), as well as possible contributions from central Nevada (for example, Roberts Mountain Allochthon, western Nevada Triassic strata). Cretaceous–dominated samples, primarily located in the southwestern Yuba River drainage, were sourced predominantly from 85 to 120 Ma batholithic rocks, whereas Jurassic-dominated samples, primarily located further east, lack mid-Cretaceous zircon and instead reflect derivation from older Jurassic crystalline and metamorphic rocks. These Jurassic–dominated samples also contain sparse Eocene–early Oligocene zircon from 42.7 to 33.0 Ma that establish an upper bound for their depositional age and likely require some extra-regional sediment input to the fluvial system, consistent with previously published sedimentologic and stratigraphic data. Overall, sampled detrital zircon age populations show that the majority of sediment deposited within the fluvial system was supplied from local metamorphic basement and/or regional batholith sources within the ancestral Sierra Nevada, with a small component of extra-regional sediment. These results support the conclusion from stratigraphic and stable isotope paleoaltimetry studies that the Sierra Nevada had a relatively steep western gradient in the Eocene–Oligocene, allowing for significant paleovalley incision and regional transport of sediment from upstream. When compared with Upper Cretaceous Great Valley group sediments, samples from the southwestern Yuba River region exhibit significantly larger proportions of 85 to 100 Ma zircon, characteristic of the voluminous Tuolumne Intrusive Series of the Sierra Nevada batholith. The predominance of Late Cretaceous detritus indicates that early to middle Eocene deposition of fluvial sediments may have coincided with deep erosion of the Tuolumne Intrusive Series. Subsequently, sediment provenance shifted from Tuolumne sources in the Late Cretaceous–dominated sediments to local Jurassic basement and extra-basinal sources in late Eocene Jurassic–dominated sediments. This may reflect progressive canyon incision and extension of headwaters eastward, and bypass of Tuolumne Intrusive Series. The youngest single-grain detrital zircon ages are similar to the range of ages of Eocene volcanic rocks in central Nevada. The presence of these grains suggests that paleo-river headwaters extended into central Nevada by Late Eocene, and that the paleo-drainage divide must have been located in easternmost Nevada. This provides additional support for the existence of a region of high elevation across what is now Nevada by late Eocene time.
Reference Key
openalex_W2006672785 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Elizabeth J. Cassel, M. Grove, S. A. Graham
Journal american journal of science
Year 2012
DOI
10.2475/02.2012.03
URL
https://doi.org/10.2475/02.2012.03
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.