Applicability of averaged concentrations in determining geochemical reaction rates in heterogeneous porous media

Clicks: 1
ID: 296772
2007
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #6,002 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This work examines the applicability of averaged concentrations, a mathematical analog of field-measured solute concentrations averaged over a large number of pores, in determining mineral reaction rates in heterogeneous porous media. Pore-scale network models were used to represent sandstones with anorthite and kaolinite as reactive minerals that are heterogeneously distributed in space. Reaction rates calculated from averaged concentrations were compared to true reaction rates that take into account variabilities in individual pore properties. Simulations were run under the highly acidic conditions relevant to geological CO~2~ sequestration in deep brine formations under various mineralogical and flow conditions. Results show that, under conditions where incomplete mixing arises, the averaged concentrations and analogously the field-measured concentrations, do not accurately reflect reaction progress. Over the length scale of several millimeters, the anorthite dissolution rates can be overestimated by a factor of three. For kaolinite, due to its highly nonlinear reaction rate law, even the reaction direction may be incorrectly determined, with precipitation predicted as dissolution. The extent of errors introduced depends on the extent of incomplete mixing. Conditions that homogenize the concentration fields, such as small reactive mineral clusters, abundant reactive minerals, and very fast or very slow flow rates, minimize errors introduced from averaging. These results indicate that the averaging scheme may partly contribute to the often-cited laboratory-field rate discrepancy and have important implications for the interpretation of concentration data obtained from field investigation.
Reference Key
openalex_W2151119380 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Li Li, Catherine A. Peters, Michael A. Celia
Journal american journal of science
Year 2007
DOI
10.2475/10.2007.02
URL
https://ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/65870.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.