The late Neoproterozoic Dahanib mafic-ultramafic intrusion, South eastern Desert, Egypt: Is it an Alaskan-type or a layered intrusion?

Clicks: 1
ID: 295979
2017
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #3,635 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
In Egypt, mafic-ultramafic complexes have been classified into three major types: incomplete ophiolite sequences; Alaskan-type intrusions, concentrically-zoned bodies formed in a subduction arc environment; and layered intrusions, vertically-zoned bodies intruded in post-collisional tectonic environments and rift-related bodies associated with the opening of the Red Sea. We present new field work, geochemical data, mineral chemistry and interpretations for the late Neoproterozoic Dahanib mafic-ultramafic intrusion in the South Eastern Desert of Egypt (northernmost Arabian--Nubian Shield, ANS). The Dahanib intrusion shows no evidence of metamorphism or deformation, with excellent preservation of intrusive contacts, well-preserved textures and primary mineralogy. Field relations indicate that it is younger than the surrounding metamorphic rocks and syn-tectonic granitoids. The intrusion is composed of a basal suite of ultramafic rocks (dunite, lherzolite, wehrlite and pyroxenite) and an overlying suite of mafic rocks (olivine gabbronorite, gabbronorite and anorthosite). It displays evident layering of modal abundance, visible directly in outcrop, as well as cryptic layering discernible through changes in mineral compositions. The western and eastern lobes of the Dahanib intrusion occur in the form of a lopolith with readily correlated layers, especially in the upper mafic unit. The present-day dip of the layering decreases from the ultramafic units into the mafic sequence. Structural and compositional relations show that the ultramafic units are cumulates from a high-Mg tholeiitic parent magma emplaced at deep crustal levels and evolved via fractional crystallization rather than any kind of residual mantle sequence. Fo content of olivine and Mg# of pyroxenes display a systematic decrease from ultramafic to mafic rocks, well-correlated with whole-rock Mg#. Spinels in ultramafic samples vary from Cr-rich to Al-rich and have Mg# and Fe^3+^\# similar to spinels from typical stratiform complexes and clearly different from those found in ophiolitic and Alaskan-type complexes. Although the mafic and ultramafic units are clearly related and can be derived from common parent magma, they were not emplaced coevally; rather, they represent different pulses of magma. The Dahanib mafic--ultramafic intrusion does not display any features that convincingly identify it as a typical Alaskan-type body, particularly the lack of clinopyroxenite and hornblendite, rarity of primary hornblende, and the notable abundance of orthopyroxene and plagioclase in its rocks. Our results confirm that it is more akin to a layered mafic-ultramafic intrusion with a multistage evolution. It was emplaced into a stable post-orogenic cratonic setting, with a trace element signature indicating contamination of the mantle source by previous subduction events.
Reference Key
openalex_W2766672967 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Mokhles K. Azer, Hisham A. Gahlan, Paul D. Asimow, Khaled Al‐Kahtany
Journal american journal of science
Year 2017
DOI
10.2475/08.2017.02
URL
https://doi.org/10.2475/08.2017.02
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.