Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: Development, validation and application of a new instrument

Clicks: 1
ID: 295776
1995
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #260 of 432 articles by views in the british journal of surgery

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 432 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
At present, an instrument for measuring the quality of life, specifically for patients with gastrointestinal disease, is not available. A new instrument for gastrointestinal disorders that is system-specific has been developed in three phases. In the first phase, questions were collated and then tested on 70 patients with gastrointestinal diseases and those that worked well were retained. In the second phase, the questions were modified and tested on 204 patients and the results verified by international experts. The instrument was also validated against other generic measures of quality of life. During the third phase, the instrument was validated with 168 normal individuals. Reproducibility was tested on 25 patients with stable gastrointestinal disease and responsiveness was tested on 194 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The result is a bilingual (German and English) questionnaire containing 36 questions each with five response categories. The responses to questions are summed to give a numerical score. It is concluded that the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) is ready to be used in clinical practice and research.
Reference Key
openalex_W2075383821 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors E. Eypasch, Jack I. Williams, Sharon Wood-Dauphinée, Benno Ure, C Schmulling, Edmund Neugebauer, H. Troidl
Journal the british journal of surgery
Year 1995
DOI
10.1002/bjs.1800820229
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.