Aluminous enclaves in gedrite-cordierite gneiss from southwestern new hampshire

Clicks: 6
ID: 295087
1969
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #5,406 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract

Background:

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is the gold-standard treatment for end-stage knee osteoarthritis (OA). An increase in the prevalance of primary and revision TKA is projected due to aging of the population, increase in the obesity and OA prevalence, patients‘ quality of life perceptions and primary TKA procedures. Although TKA reliably improves pain and function; gait ability and function are still low compared to normal levels [1]. It is important to understand the prognosis to decide to undergo a rTKA (revision total knee arthroplasty) or enhance treatment protocols [2].

Objectives:

The aim of the study is to compare the functional results of primary and revision TKA.

Methods:

Hospital Of Special Surgery knee score (HSS), The Figure-Of-8 Walk Test (F8WT), The Modified Four Step Square Test (mFSST) and the 3-Meter Backwards Walk Test (3MBWT) were used for function assessment.

Conclusion:

Functional status, fall risk, balance and walking skills of the rTKA patients were lower than the TKA patients. rTKA patients experience longer operation time, hospital stay and make fewer functional gains. Improvement after rTKA is also reported to be lower than TKA and balance could be worsened or does not improve after TKA [2]. Walking skills of the rTKA patients were worse than the TKA patients which may cause rTKA patients to be more cautious and tentative due to fear of falling and failure of the implant leading a more impaired function [2]. rTKA patients’ balance was lower and had more fall risk than the patients with TKA. These may be due to the recurrent incision of soft tissues causing a loss of more mechanoreceptors and a greater impairment of proprioception. These findings can help clinicians to make a more informed decision for both primary and revision procedures [3].

References:

[1]Jiang Y, Sanchez-Santos MT, Judge AD et al. Predictors of Patient-Reported Pain and Functional Outcomes Over 10 Years After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32: 92-100.e102. [2]Vincent KR, Vincent HK, Lee LW, Alfano AP. Inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 446: 201-207. [3]Wodowski AJ, Swigler CW, Liu H et al. Proprioception and knee arthroplasty: a literature review. Orthopedic Clinics 2016; 47: 301-309.

Disclosure of Interests:

None declared
Reference Key
openalex_W2320809029 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors P. Robinson, Howard W. Jaffe
Journal american journal of science
Year 1969
DOI
10.2475/ajs.267.3.389
URL
https://ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/59321.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.