Alkaline and subalkaline basalts

Clicks: 1
ID: 294187
1966
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #3,410 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Most Cenozoic basic volcanics can be classed as alkaline or subalkaline depending on whether their norms contain ne or Q. Probably less than 25 percent of all analyses of Cenozoic basic volcanics yield norms containing neither ne nor Q. Such analyses fall in the normative ternary di9-hy9-ol9, and if they were classified by means of a discriminant based upon any pair of these three variables natural groupings would usually be preserved. In view of its recent history and development, the term tholeiite, particularly in its present broad connotation, should be abandoned. Alternatively, as suggested by Jung (1958), it should be strictly confined to rocks similar to those of the type locality.
Reference Key
openalex_W2321235072 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Felix Chayes
Journal american journal of science
Year 1966
DOI
10.2475/ajs.264.2.128
URL
https://ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/59116.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.