Biological energy in landscape evolution

Clicks: 6
ID: 294073
2009
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #2,915 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Traditional conceptual models of landscape evolution view topography as an outcome of endogenic forces (uplift) working against exogenic forces of denudation. The energy considerations of these concepts have focused on the conversion of the potential energy of landscape relief to kinetic energy. The concept of the biosphere as a planetary membrane for capturing and converting solar energy, coupled with the critical geomorphic role of biota, call for a consideration of biotic contributions to geomorphic work. A review of estimates of global rates of kinetic energy of denudation and uplift, and net primary production (NPP) indicates that the energy density of NPP is, on average, three to seven orders of magnitude greater than the others. If even a tiny fraction of NPP is geologically significant, then the biological subsidy to the energy of landscape evolution must be considered on a par with that of geophysical and geochemical phenomena. A case study in eastern Kentucky shows that even if only 0.1 percent of NPP is geomorphically significant, it still far exceeds the energy inputs from uplift and conversion of potential to kinetic energy by denudation. This is unlikely to be unique, though the relative importance of biological and geophysical processes must obviously vary with climate, tectonic setting, and other factors. Results indicate that, particularly where biological activity is significant, geomorphic work performed by biota may be greater than that associated with endogenic processes and with the kinetic energy of denudation.
Reference Key
openalex_W2115632106 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jonathan D. Phillips
Journal american journal of science
Year 2009
DOI
10.2475/04.2009.01
URL
https://ajs.scholasticahq.com/article/61772.pdf
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.