Classification of arenites

Clicks: 1
ID: 293675
1960
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #3,924 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Discusses the recent classification schemes for arenites of Pettijohn, Gilbert, Packham, and Folk. A more generalized scheme is suggested after the MLQ (matrix, labiles, quartz) diagram of Packham which enables a classification of arenites when data on sedimentary structures are not available. A new QFR (quartz, feldspar, rock fragments) diagram is introduced. When used in conjunction with Packham9s classification, an arenite can be named in the field or in the laboratory and, after study of the sedimentary structures, a final name can be given with both descriptive and genetic connotations. Pyroclastic arenites, glacial arenites, and arenites with abundant detrital carbonate are not included under the present classification scheme.
Reference Key
openalex_W2088897927 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Keith A.W. Crook
Journal american journal of science
Year 1960
DOI
10.2475/ajs.258.6.419
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.