Slow Rates of Rock Surface Erosion and Sediment Production across the Namib Desert and Escarpment, Southern Africa

Clicks: 3
ID: 292726
2001
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1,052 of 8,486 articles by views in american journal of science

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 8,486 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Slow erosion has characterized the Namib Desert, the Namibian escarpment, and the adjacent Namibian highlands over the Pleistocene. Paired analyses (n = 66) of in-situ-produced 10Be and 26Al in quartz-bearing samples of bedrock primarily from inselbergs, of sediment from dry river and stream channels, and of clasts from desert surfaces reveal large inventories of these cosmogenic nuclides indicating significant landscape stability over at least the past million years. Bedrock samples (n = 47) collected in three transects from the coast, across the escarpment, and into the highlands, show no spatial pattern in elevation-normalized nuclide abundance despite a difference in mean annual precipitation (MAP) between sample sites at the coast (MAP <25 mm yr−1) and those in the highlands (MAP >400 mm yr−1). Average model erosion rates inland of the escarpment (3.2 ± 1.5, n = 9) are indistinguishable from average rates seaward of the escarpment (3.6 ± 1.9, n = 38) indicating that rock on the pedimented coastal plain is eroding at the same rate as rock in the highlands. Sediment samples (n = 3) from small streams suggest that the landscape as a whole is eroding more rapidly than the bedrock outcrops and that a basin in the steep escarpment zone is eroding several times faster (16 m my−1) than either a basin in the highlands (5 m my−1) or a basin in the coastal plain (8 m my−1). Data from large rivers (n = 4) constrain erosion rates, averaged over 105 yrs and 104 to 105 km2, between 3 and 9 m my−1. Small quartz clasts (n = 12) collected from four desert surfaces record extraordinarily long, variable, and in some cases complex exposure histories. Simple 10Be model ages are as high as 1.8 my; some minimum total histories, considering both 10Be and 26Al and including both burial and exposure, exceed 2.7 my. As a group, the Namibian cosmogenic data do not support the model of significant and on-going escarpment retreat. The similarity of erosion rates calculated from 10Be analysis of fluvial sediments and longer-term (107 yr), average mass removal rates estimated by others using fission track analysis of rock suggests that Namibian erosion rates have reached a steady state and are changing little over time. At outcrop scales, the concordance of 10Be and 26Al in most bedrock samples suggests that the model of steady, uniform bedrock erosion is valid; there is no indication of intermittent burial, shedding of thick rock slabs, or stripping of previous cover. At an intermediate scale, a transect of bedrock samples north of Gobabeb demonstrates that the northern boundary of the massive Namib Sand Sea has been steady and unshifting. Similarly low cosmogenically estimated erosion rates across west and central Namibia suggest that the landscape is in geomorphic steady state, its overall appearance changing only slowly through time.
Reference Key
openalex_W2111996152 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Paul R. Bierman, Marc Caffee
Journal american journal of science
Year 2001
DOI
10.2475/ajs.301.4-5.326
URL
https://doi.org/10.2475/ajs.301.4-5.326
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.