Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: an overview

Clicks: 1
ID: 290868
2000
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #644 of 829 articles by views in BMC Bioinformatics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 829 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract 4 Also at the Department of Biological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA, to whom all correspondence should be addressed. We provide a unified overview of methods that currently are widely used to assess the accuracy of prediction algorithms, from raw percentages, quadratic error measures and other distances, and correlation coefficients, and to information theoretic measures such as relative entropy and mutual information. We briefly discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. For classification tasks, we derive new learning algorithms for the design of prediction systems by directly optimising the correlation coefficient. We observe and prove several results relating sensitivity and specificity of optimal systems. While the principles are general, we illustrate the applicability on specific problems such as protein secondary structure and signal peptide prediction. Contact: pfbaldi@ics.uci.edu
Reference Key
openalex_W2107432340 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Pierre Baldi, Søren Brunak, Yves Chauvin, Claus A. Andersen, Henrik Nielsen
Journal BMC Bioinformatics
Year 2000
DOI
10.1093/bioinformatics/16.5.412
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.