Artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law: a primer
Clicks: 31
ID: 283304
2021
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
9.0
/100
31 views
14 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #702 of 803 articles by views in arXiv
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 803 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In September 2019, the Council of Europe's Committee of Ministers adopted the
terms of reference for the Ad Hoc Committee on Artificial Intelligence (CAHAI).
The CAHAI is charged with examining the feasibility and potential elements of a
legal framework for the design, development, and deployment of AI systems that
accord with Council of Europe standards across the interrelated areas of human
rights, democracy, and the rule of law. As a first and necessary step in
carrying out this responsibility, the CAHAI's Feasibility Study, adopted by its
plenary in December 2020, has explored options for an international legal
response that fills existing gaps in legislation and tailors the use of binding
and non-binding legal instruments to the specific risks and opportunities
presented by AI systems. The Study examines how the fundamental rights and
freedoms that are already codified in international human rights law can be
used as the basis for such a legal framework. The purpose of this primer is to
introduce the main concepts and principles presented in the CAHAI's Feasibility
Study for a general, non-technical audience. It also aims to provide some
background information on the areas of AI innovation, human rights law,
technology policy, and compliance mechanisms covered therein. In keeping with
the Council of Europe's commitment to broad multi-stakeholder consultations,
outreach, and engagement, this primer has been designed to help facilitate the
meaningful and informed participation of an inclusive group of stakeholders as
the CAHAI seeks feedback and guidance regarding the essential issues raised by
the Feasibility Study.
| Reference Key |
briggs2021artificial
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | David Leslie; Christopher Burr; Mhairi Aitken; Josh Cowls; Michael Katell; Morgan Briggs |
| Journal | arXiv |
| Year | 2021 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.