Growers' Adoption of USDA GAP, Other Harmonized GAP & Group Produce Audits: Drivers, Constraints, and Fostering Improved Implementation.

Clicks: 119
ID: 283185
2025
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #55 of 59 articles by views in Journal of food protection

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The USDA, with produce sector stakeholders, developed voluntary fee-for-service food safety audit schemes- USDA GAP&GHP, USDA Harmonized GAP (HGAP), USDA HGAP Plus+, and USDA GroupGAP- to help growers verify compliance with Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs). Aligned with produce safety regulatory requirements and designed to vary in scope and complexity, the schemes aim to meet diverse grower and buyer needs. For unclear reasons, growers' adoption of USDA GAPs audit schemes remains low relative to private standards. So, using data from growers (n=208 surveyed) and service providers (n=55 surveyed, 7 interviewed), we explored factors influencing growers' implementation of USDA GAPs programs. Buyers' requests and food safety requirements were key drivers of adoption. However, many growers cited a lack of buyers' demand for USDA GAPs schemes, a key barrier to broader adoption. Small- and medium-scale growers also face technical and financial challenges inhibiting adoption, which could be addressed by government, private sector, and nonprofit stakeholders. Implementing USDA GAPs must be profitable for small growers, highlighting the need to align adoption efforts with USDA's broader strategy to connect them to profitable markets. Negative audit experiences and concerns about non-conformities escalating to the FDA deter adoption. Enhancing outreach, education, and trust through Cooperative Extension and regional networks is crucial for improved understanding, acceptance, and adoption of USDA GAPs schemes. The findings call for coordinated multi-stakeholder efforts to address the economic, informational, and perceptual barriers through targeted, multipronged interventions.
Reference Key
adebiyi2025growers Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Adebiyi, Jelili Adegboyega; Bourquin, Leslie D
Journal Journal of food protection
Year 2025
DOI
10.1016/j.jfp.2025.100530
URL
Keywords
adoption implementation constraints service providers growers usda gap standards usda gap&ghp usda groupgap usda hgap plus+ usda harmonized gap(hgap)

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.