Comparison of Four Different Pain Relief Methods during Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Controlled Study
Clicks: 128
ID: 276303
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
128 views
29 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #15 of 16 articles by views in pain research and management
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is the most commonly used method for evaluating the anatomy and patency of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes, and is an important tool in the evaluation of infertility. The most frequent side effect is the pain associated with the procedure.
| Reference Key |
unlu2015comparisonpain
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Unlu, Bekir Serdar;Yilmazer, Mehmet;Koken, Gulengul;Arioz, Dagistan Tolga;Unlu, Ebru;Baki, Elif Dogan;Kurttay, Cemile;Karacin, Osman; |
| Journal | pain research and management |
| Year | 2015 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.